In the article Consider
the Lobster, by David Foster he explores the concept of eating lobster in
New England. There, its considered to be a valued tradition and something
everyone partakes in, especially during festivals and other celebrations. The
focal point of his article centers around how lobsters can feel pain and
the way they are killed to be eaten causes them great distress. Many
organizations, as Fosters lists, are against the way lobsters are eaten and
killed. Organizations like PETA have protested outwardly against the festivals
in New England and have tried to encourage other people to not eat lobsters. On
the other side of the argument, many who do not eat lobster have little
knowledge or opinion about how lobsters are killed and how they feel pain. Foster
provides many expert examples and data collected from scientific tests in order
to organize his point. Foster’s set up of the piece relates to Huxley’s second
form, moving towards object, historical facts, which are the concrete evidence
displayed in this article. This speaks to the logos of his writing. The ethos appeals
to the reader’s sensitivity to boiling lobsters alive, even though the majority
of the argument is based in facts rather than personal appeals. This article is
mostly informative as many people do not stop and think about how a lobster is
prepared for them, nor do they think about how lobsters actually have pain
receptors. In the title of the article, Foster phrases it in such a way that
asks readers to question something they might not have thought about otherwise.
Overall, Foster has chosen a point of interest where the standpoints are polar
extremes. One is either incredibly passionate about it or they do not care at
all. It provides another perspective without swaying the reader to one side or
another.
No comments:
Post a Comment