Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Source 2 Comparative Rhetorical Analysis

Section 1:

VICE(@VICE). “Why Colin Kaepernick’s protest matters.” 5 September 2016, 3:00
PM. Tweet.

Section 2:

The main argument of the post is evident in the words, as it talks about why Kaepernick’s protest matters. It also include a link to article written by VICE. The article provides more background into the purpose and point of the tweet. The comments section under the tweet includes many commenters who feel strongly against the message of the tweet.

Section 3:
            Audience: General public, anyone with a twitter
            Purpose: To inform its audience of the current issue and give background.

            The tweet itself is basic message designed for a casual audience, and uses simple language. The caption under the link shows contempt for the media influence over the story. It utilizes persuasive language to show the writer’s opinion and why they think they are correct.

Utilizes Ethos.

The limited amount of characters that a tweet can contain requires the user to be adept at pulling the reader in, as evident in VICE’s tweet. They want their audience to read their article and to be convince of its relevance. Using question words such as “why” automatically indicate to the reader that a message is trying to be conveyed, and it is left to interpretation of whether or not the audience chooses to side with or against the message.


 A tweet is an informal platform.

No comments:

Post a Comment